An online repository of journalism and other writings I've found in my pursuit of progressive ideas in business and finance.
Design Credit: "Catching Elephant" Theme by Andy Taylor
Tags:
awesome women
big ideas
business and government
change management
charts and graphs
consumer safety
corporate boards
corporate social responsibility
corporate values
design thinking
diversity in the workplace
econ 101
ethical considerations
executive compensation
family leave
finance
from the recent archives
gen y
income inequality
innovation
international business
leadership
management
moral capitalism
organizational change
organizational design
profit margins
public private partnerships
scandals!
social media
stakeholder engagement
stronger middle class
sustainability
the case for regulation
the fed
the tech world
transforming the workplace
treating employees right
women in the workplace
work life balance
In today’s New York Times article about a regulator’s investigation into JPMorgan Chase. This is the culture that we’re up against.
Discovered this graphic on Ernst & Young’s website about its organizational change practice and, well, I’m obsessed.
A good crash course for fellow incoming MBA students!
The bottom line: Reach out to all of the decision-makers and build relationships. Maggie Wilderotter, the executive interviewed for this piece, has been on 23 boards in the last 28 years, so she knows what she’s talking about.
The Economist, “Emotional Breakdown: Can leaders be identified by psychometrics?”, 4/6/13 issue
From commentary by Tom Randall on Bloomberg criticizing a bill in the Kansas state legislature that would make it illegal to use “public funds to promote or implement sustainable development.” As Tom Randall points out above, sustainability is a pro-growth business initiative. Regardless of political beliefs, on an even more foundational level, we should agree that it is imperative to preserve the Earth’s resources for future generations.
Paraphrased from the NYT Magazine
Zoom in to see more of this brilliant illustration about the challenges and potential for sustainability efforts. Via The Regeneration Roadmap.
For me, the key area of this diagram is the bottom left corner, spanning the sections “A More Collaborative Future” and “Partnership Performance & Policy.” The question I am burning to figure out in my career is, “What will the drivers be, and who will lead, without a regulatory or accountability mechanism?”
This chart offers three potential outcomes: Push, be pulled, or be forced through regulatory mechanisms. Some corporations have already stepped up to incorporate sustainable practices into their operations. These leaders are the pushers. Once they establish success over competitors who had not yet adopted sustainability, a second wave of corporations will be pulled into doing so by the currents of market forces. Finally, regulations can force anyone who has not adopted sustainability to do so with the threat of government-mandated financial repercussions.
Typically, regulations are the first driver to get business and society to make a significant structural change (for example, child labor). But the problem, as this diagram points out several times, is that there is currently a lack of political will to motivate governments to create regulations. So we may have to find ways to encourage sustainability through the first two options—and be prepared for it to take longer to bear fruit.
.@starbucks to use 100% RSPO certified palm oil by 2015 due to Green Century’s shareholder advocacy #investgreen bit.ly/Y7TmXO
— Green Century (@Green__Century) February 21, 2013